Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 178352 -

G.R. No. 178352 - VIRGILIO S. DELIMA, VS. SUSAN MERCAIDA GOIS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 404,RA 464,RA 1,RA 384RA 494
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered- 1. Finding illegality in the dismissal of complainant Virgilio Delima from his employment; 2. Ordering respondent Golden Union Aquamarine Corporation to pay complainant the following: a. Backwages (July 30, 2004 to April 29, 2005 = 9 mos.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered- 1. Finding illegality in the dismissal of complainant Virgilio Delima from his employment; 2. Ordering respondent Golden Union Aquamarine Corporation to pay complainant the following: a. Backwages (July 30, 2004 to April 29, 2005 = 9 mos.; P5,350.50 x 9 months) P 48,154.50 b. Separation Pay (P5,350.50 x 4 years) 21,402.00 c. Salary Differentials 32,679.00 d. Service Incentive Leave Pay 2,820.00 Sub-Total P105,055.50 e. Attorney's fee (10%) 10,505.55 T O T A L P115,561.05 ========= 3. Dismissing all other claims for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.