Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , prescinding from the foregoing consideration, the Decision appealed from is REVERSED and SET ASIDE and a new one ENTERED finding the dismissal of complainant illegal thus ordering the respondent to pay her backwages from April 30, 1998 up to date hereof and in lieu of reinstatement, the respondent is further ordered to pay complainant separation pay computes at the rate of one (1) month pay for every year of service from date of hiring on September 2, 1990 up to the finality of this …
WHEREFORE , prescinding from the foregoing consideration, the Decision appealed from is REVERSED and SET ASIDE and a new one ENTERED finding the dismissal of complainant illegal thus ordering the respondent to pay her backwages from April 30, 1998 up to date hereof and in lieu of reinstatement, the respondent is further ordered to pay complainant separation pay computes at the rate of one (1) month pay for every year of service from date of hiring on September 2, 1990 up to the finality of this decision. All other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 226002 - LINO A. FERNANDEZ, JR., VS. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY (MERALCO).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 226002 -
CaseG.R. No. 110524 - DOUGLAS MILLARES AND ROGELIO LAGDA, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, TRANS-GLOBAL MARITIME AGENCY, INC. AND ESSO INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CO., LTD..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 110524 -
CaseG.R. No. 164423 - TRIUMPH INTERNATIONAL (PHILS.), INC., VS. RAMON L. APOSTOL AND BEN M. OPULENCIA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164423 -