TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, complainant is found to have been illegally dismissed even as respondents are held liable therefor. Consequently, respondent corporation is hereby ordered to pay complainant's full backwages from the time of his illegal dismissal until the finality of this decision, initially computed at this time at Php72,635.96. Respondent corporation is likewise ordered to pay complainant's separation pay of Php33,072.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, complainant is found to have been illegally dismissed even as respondents are held liable therefor. Consequently, respondent corporation is hereby ordered to pay complainant's full backwages from the time of his illegal dismissal until the finality of this decision, initially computed at this time at Php72,635.96. Respondent corporation is likewise ordered to pay complainant's separation pay of Php33,072.00, and a service incentive leave pay of Php4,770.00. All other claims are hereby dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 178352 - VIRGILIO S. DELIMA, VS. SUSAN MERCAIDA GOIS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 178352 -
CaseG.R. No. 148287 - PET PLANS, INC. AND ADRIAN V. OCAMPO, VS. COURT OF APPEALS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 148287 -
CaseG.R. No. 196134 - VALENTIN S. LOZADA, VS. MAGTANGGOL MENDOZA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 196134 -