Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds that the evidence presented has sufficiently established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The accused Zedric V. Sayco is convicted for violation of Section 1 of Presidential Decree No. 1866, as amended by Republic Act No.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds that the evidence presented has sufficiently established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The accused Zedric V. Sayco is convicted for violation of Section 1 of Presidential Decree No. 1866, as amended by Republic Act No. 8294. There being no modifying circumstances, and applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, the Court sentences the accused to a prison term ranging from THREE YEARS, SIX MONTHS AND TWENTY DAYS of Prision Correccional Medium as minimum, to FIVE YEARS, FOUR MONTHS and TWENTY DAYS of Prision Correccional Maximum as maximum, and to pay a fine of FIFTEEN THOUSAND PESOS. The firearm (Exhibit A) and the ammunitions (Exhibit B) are forfeited in favor of the government, to be disposed of in accordance with law. IT IS SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 221006 - JEOFFY GEROBIESE Y ALEMANIA ALIAS "JEFF,", VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 221006 -
CaseG.R. No. 130800 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. GUILLERMO NEPOMUCENO, JR., ACCUSED-. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 130800 -
CaseG.R. No. 231787 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. RODEL VELASCO Y LUZON, ACCUSED-.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 231787 -