Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 166760 -

G.R. No. 166760 -

Cited Laws

RA 368RA 329RA 168,RA 792RA 264RA 496RA 125RA 70,RA 179,RA 259RA 78RA 634,RA 429RA 342RA 154,RA 532,RA 535RA 119RA 494RA 128
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainants, holding that no sufficient ground to validly considered [sic] them resigned from their job and holding illegal their dismissal from the service by reason therefor. Accordingly, respondent company is ordered to reinstate them to their former position without loss of seniority rights and with full backwages, as shown in the attached computation hereof which is adopted as our own and forming part of the decision as Annex "A".

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainants, holding that no sufficient ground to validly considered [sic] them resigned from their job and holding illegal their dismissal from the service by reason therefor. Accordingly, respondent company is ordered to reinstate them to their former position without loss of seniority rights and with full backwages, as shown in the attached computation hereof which is adopted as our own and forming part of the decision as Annex "A". Further, holding respondent company guilty of unfair labor practice act under par. c, Article 248 of the Labor Code, as amended and thereby ordered to pay each of the complianant and the union the amount of P5,000.00 as and for damages. The other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.