TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, respondent Sheriff Sotero S. Paclibar is hereby found guilty of simple negligence and a FINE is hereby imposed on the respondent in the amount of Two Thousand Pesos (P2,000.00) with a WARNING that a repetition of the same in the future shall be dealt with accordingly. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, respondent Sheriff Sotero S. Paclibar is hereby found guilty of simple negligence and a FINE is hereby imposed on the respondent in the amount of Two Thousand Pesos (P2,000.00) with a WARNING that a repetition of the same in the future shall be dealt with accordingly. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. P-04-1897 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 02-1300-P) - ARTURO GRAYDA, COMPLAINANT, VS. NOEL G. PRIMO, SHERIFF IV, BRANCH 65, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BULAN, SORSOGON.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-04-1897
CaseA.M. No. P-07-2307 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 03-1740-P) - NECENIO GILLANA, Complainant, vs. BALBINO B. GERMINAL, and Sheriff IV, Regional Trial Court, Branch 60, Cadiz City, Negros Occidental.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-07-2307
CaseA.M. No. P-04-1928 [OCA-I.P.I. No. 04-1917-P] - TEODORO M. GARCIA, COMPLAINANT, VS. RUEL MAGCALAS, SHERIFF IV, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 28, STA. CRUZ, LAGUNA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-04-1928