Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 121908 -

G.R. No. 121908 - ESTER SANTIAGO, PRISCILLA SANTIAGO, SUSAN SANTIAGO, JOSE SANTIAGO, JR., ERLINDA SANTIAGO, MA. VICTORIA SANTIAGO, APOLINARIO SANTIAGO AND CARMENCITA SANTIAGO, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. CAMILO O. MONTESA, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH 19, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MALOLOS, BULACAN,

Cited Laws

RA 242RA 735RA 212RA 47RA 582
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, the above-entitled case is hereby DISMISSED for lack of sufficient cause of action against the defendants. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, the above-entitled case is hereby DISMISSED for lack of sufficient cause of action against the defendants. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. NO. 153914 - FELIPE REGIS, JR., VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND AGAPITO GARCIA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 153914 -

Case

G.R. No. 205194 -

G.R. No. 205194 -

Case

G.R. NO. 150949 - JUDGE DOLORES L. ESPAÑOL,* PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 90, DASMARIÑAS, CAVITE, VS. ATTY. BENJAMIN S. FORMOSO AND SPOUSES BENITO SEE AND MARLY SEE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 150949 -