Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, whereas, the private defendant's counterclaims, which need further substantiation, are likewise dismissed. However, the said private defendants are not precluded from pursuing their rightful course(s) of action in the interest of justice. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the instant case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, whereas, the private defendant's counterclaims, which need further substantiation, are likewise dismissed. However, the said private defendants are not precluded from pursuing their rightful course(s) of action in the interest of justice. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 204992 - AURORA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF DIONISIA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF JOSE TENSUAN, ANITA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF LEYDA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF FRANCISCO TENSUAN, AND RICARDO TENSUAN, REPRESENTED BY AMPARO S. TENSUAN, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, VS. HEIRS OF MA. ISABEL M. VASQUEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Libr
G.R. No. 204992 -
CaseG.R. No. 194846 - *HOSPICIO D. ROSAROSO, ANTONIO D. ROSAROSO, MANUEL D. ROSAROSO, ALGERICA D. ROSAROSO, AND CLEOFE R. LABINDAO, VS. LUCILA LABORTE SORIA, SPOUSES HAM SOLUTAN AND **LAILA SOLUTAN, AND MERIDIAN REALTY CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 194846 -
CaseG.R. No. 121908 - ESTER SANTIAGO, PRISCILLA SANTIAGO, SUSAN SANTIAGO, JOSE SANTIAGO, JR., ERLINDA SANTIAGO, MA. VICTORIA SANTIAGO, APOLINARIO SANTIAGO AND CARMENCITA SANTIAGO, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. CAMILO O. MONTESA, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH 19, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MALOLOS, BULACAN,
G.R. No. 121908 -