Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court hereby opine[s] that plaintiff [Regis] had failed to prove any cause of action against defendant [Garcia], hence, the Court hereby order[s] the Dismissal of the case for [having] no cause of action. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court hereby opine[s] that plaintiff [Regis] had failed to prove any cause of action against defendant [Garcia], hence, the Court hereby order[s] the Dismissal of the case for [having] no cause of action. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 205194 -
G.R. No. 205194 -
CaseA.C. No. 4700 - RICARDO B. MANUBAY, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. GINA C. GARCIA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 4700
CaseG.R. No. 121908 - ESTER SANTIAGO, PRISCILLA SANTIAGO, SUSAN SANTIAGO, JOSE SANTIAGO, JR., ERLINDA SANTIAGO, MA. VICTORIA SANTIAGO, APOLINARIO SANTIAGO AND CARMENCITA SANTIAGO, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. CAMILO O. MONTESA, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH 19, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, MALOLOS, BULACAN,
G.R. No. 121908 -