Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 204992 -

G.R. No. 204992 - AURORA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF DIONISIA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF JOSE TENSUAN, ANITA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF LEYDA TENSUAN, HEIRS OF FRANCISCO TENSUAN, AND RICARDO TENSUAN, REPRESENTED BY AMPARO S. TENSUAN, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, VS. HEIRS OF MA. ISABEL M. VASQUEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Libr

Cited Laws

RA 386,
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

Decision

Ruling

Accordingly, the decision of this court dated September 16, 2010 is hereby recalled and set aside. The instant case is hereby dismissed. There being lack of proof of malicious prosecution, for lack of merit, the counterclaim is likewise dismissed. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. NO. 150949 - JUDGE DOLORES L. ESPAÑOL,* PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 90, DASMARIÑAS, CAVITE, VS. ATTY. BENJAMIN S. FORMOSO AND SPOUSES BENITO SEE AND MARLY SEE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 150949 -

Case

G.R. No. 194548 - JUANA VDA. DE ROJALES, SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS, REPRESENTED BY CELERINA ROJALES-SEVILLA, VS. MARCELINO DIME, SUBSTITUTED BY HIS HEIRS, REPRESENTED BY BONIFACIA MANIBAY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 194548 -