Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 103103 -

G.R. No. 103103 - ENRIQUE P. SUPLICO, LOLITA T. SUPLICO, ENRIQUE T. SUPLICO, JR., AND DAVID T. SUPLICO, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND FEDERICO ARMADA.

Cited Laws

RA 557,RA 223,RA 3844RA 44RA 122,RA 6657
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered: "1. Declaring plaintiff FEDERICO ARMADA a bona fide agricultural lessee of the landholding in question with an area of two and a half (2 1/2) hectares more or less belonging to the intervenors; "2. Permanently enjoining the defendant/intervenors from ejecting or removing plaintiff from his landholding aforementioned situated in sitio Langka, Brgy. Taloc, Bago City; "3.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered: "1. Declaring plaintiff FEDERICO ARMADA a bona fide agricultural lessee of the landholding in question with an area of two and a half (2 1/2) hectares more or less belonging to the intervenors; "2. Permanently enjoining the defendant/intervenors from ejecting or removing plaintiff from his landholding aforementioned situated in sitio Langka, Brgy. Taloc, Bago City; "3. Ordering the plaintiffs to pay to the defendant/intervenors two hundred fifty-four (254) cavans of palay as back rentals or their money equivalent, less whatever amount may have been paid or deposited with the court after this date; and "4. Dismissing all other claims and counterclaims for damages for lack of and/or insufficiency of evidence. "So Ordered.