Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Court finds that plaintiffs were illegally ejected by the defendants from their leasehold landholdings and hereby renders judgment against them and orders said defendants: A. To reinstate plaintiffs to the one (1) hectare land occupied by them prior to their ejectment as leaseholders under the Agrarian Land Reform Code; B.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Court finds that plaintiffs were illegally ejected by the defendants from their leasehold landholdings and hereby renders judgment against them and orders said defendants: A. To reinstate plaintiffs to the one (1) hectare land occupied by them prior to their ejectment as leaseholders under the Agrarian Land Reform Code; B. To carry successfully such reinstatement, defendants are ordered to vacate the premises covered by the possession of plaintiffs as such leasehold, which temporarily given to them and other persons brought by defendants or may be found in the premises are also ordered to vacate the same; C. To pay plaintiffs the amount of P 8,700.00 as unrealized produce of the land in question, which they are entitled because of their unlawful ejectment; and D. Pay plaintiffs P 2,000.00 as attorneys fees; and E. Making the injunction permanent. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 150207 - VALENTIN P. FRAGINAL, TOMAS P. FRAGINAL AND ANGELINA FRAGINAL-QUINO, VS. THE HEIRS OF TORIBIA BELMONTE PARAÑAL, REPRESENTED BY PEDRO PARAÑAL, FELISA PARAÑAL, ABRAHAM PARAÑAL, IRENEA ACABADO AND JOSEFA ESTOY. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 150207 -
CaseG.R. No. 166944 - JUANITO MAGSINO, VS. ELENA DE OCAMPO AND RAMON GUICO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 166944 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 104774-75 - ZACARIAS OARDE AND PRESENTACION MOLAR, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES WILFREDO AND LOURDES GUERRERO AND SPOUSES ROGELIO AND VILMA MOLAR.
G.R. Nos. 104774-75 -