Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered: 1. Declaring respondent company not guilty of unfair labor practice. (ULP); 2. Declaring respondent company not guilty of illegal dismissal and illegal lay-off but directing it to pay the individual complaints their separation pay, to wit: a) Adeser, Tarcisio ----------- P 20,280.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered: 1. Declaring respondent company not guilty of unfair labor practice. (ULP); 2. Declaring respondent company not guilty of illegal dismissal and illegal lay-off but directing it to pay the individual complaints their separation pay, to wit: a) Adeser, Tarcisio ----------- P 20,280.00 b) Albino, Silveria ----------- 36,816.00 c) Arizala, Imelda ----------- 18,408.00 d) Canares, Danilo ----------- 36,816.00 e) Carin, Elena ---------- 12,272.00 f) Cabanatan, Lourdes ----------- 9,204.00 g) Dizon, Juanito ----------- 12,272.00 h) Domingo, Salome -------- 24,544.00 i) Esguerra, Bonifacio ---------- 21,476.00 j) Famillaran, Benjamin ----------- 27,612.00 k) Gabucan, Amelia ------------ 15,340.00 l) Ibardolaza, Hadjie ------------- 21,476.00 m) Jores, Nelita ------------- 18,408.00 n) Largadas, Mario ------------- 9,204.00 o) Mitschek, Dexter ------------- 33,748.00 p) Paquit, Edgar ------------- 15,340.00 q) Panotes, Roel ------------- 12,272.00 r) Pedrigosa, Lerma ------------- 18,408.00 s) Pedrigosa, Liza ------------- 18,408.00 t) Ulzoron, Yolanda ------------- 9,204.00 u) Viguesilla, Edgardo ------------ 21,476.00 v) Viray, Ruel ---------------- 9,204.00 --------------- P 422,188.00 3. Directing respondent company to pay complainants the sum of P280,010.00 as to their other money claims aforestated, distributed as follows: a) Adeser, Tarcisio ---------------- P 5,330.00 b) Albino, Silveria -------------- 13,080.00 c) Arizala, Imelda -------------- 13,080.00 d) Canares, Danilo -------------- 13,080.00 e) Carin, Elena -------------- 13,080.00 f) Cabanatan, Lourdes ------------- 13,080.00 g) Dizon, Juanito -------------- 13,080.00 h) Domingo, Salome -------------- 13,080.00 i) Esguerra, Bonifacio ------------- 13,080.00 j) Famillaran, Benjamin ----------- 13,080.00 k) Gabucan, Amelia -------------- 13,080.00 l) Ibardolaza, Hadjie -------------- 13,080.00 m) Jores, Nelita -------------- 13,080.00 n) Largadas, Mario -------------- 13,080.00 o) Mitschek, Dexter -------------- 13,080.00 p) Paquit, Edgar -------------- 13,080.00 q) Panotes, Roel -------------- 13,080.00 r) Pedrigosa, Lerma -------------- 13,080.00 s) Pedrigosa, Liza -------------- 13,080.00 t) Ulzoron, Yolanda -------------- 13,080.00 u) Viguesilla, Edgardo ------------ 13,080.00 v) Viray, Ruel -------------- 13,080.00 ---------------- P 280,010.00 4. Directing respondent company to pay complainants attorneys fees of ten (10%) percent based on the totality of the monetary award. Other claims are hereby dismissed for lack of factual and legal basis. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 135721 - CHUA TEE DEE, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF PIONEER ENTERPRISES, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND J.C. AGRICOM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 135721 -
CaseG.R. No. 192318 - REYNO C. DIMSON, VS. GERRY T. CHUA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 192318 -
CaseG.R. No. 180718 - HENLIN PANAY COMPANY AND/OR EDWIN FRANCISCO/ ANGEL LAZARO III, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (NLRC) AND NORY A. BOLANOS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 180718 -