Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 192318 -

G.R. No. 192318 - REYNO C. DIMSON, VS. GERRY T. CHUA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 187,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered: A) Declaring that the Complainants were illegally separated from their employment, and consequently, they are entitled to payment of separation pay equivalent to one month pay per year of service and to payment of backwages reckoned from June 2000 until the finality of this decision and to payment of Service Incentive Leave Pay and 13 th month pay.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered: A) Declaring that the Complainants were illegally separated from their employment, and consequently, they are entitled to payment of separation pay equivalent to one month pay per year of service and to payment of backwages reckoned from June 2000 until the finality of this decision and to payment of Service Incentive Leave Pay and 13 th month pay. b) Declaring Respondents SEASUMCO and x x x MAC, including their respective presidents and board of directors jointly and severally liable to all the monetary entitlements of all Complainants as above granted. c) Dismissing the complaints/claims against Respondents UCPB and COSUCECO for lack of employer-employee relationship; and d) Ordering Respondents SEASUMCO and MAC, its respective presidents and members of the board of directors to pay jointly and severally the Complainants the amount of THREE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY[-]SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY & 51/100 (P3,827,470.51) covering the entitlements representing partial computations of the complainants' entitlement herein. All other claims are dismissed for lack of legal and factual basis. SO ORDERED.