Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, this Court hereby orders the following: 1. The Motion to Dismiss Civil Case No. 548-C is hereby GRANTED and Civil Case No. 548[-C] is hereby ordered DISMISSED for violation of the rule on forum shopping; 2.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, this Court hereby orders the following: 1. The Motion to Dismiss Civil Case No. 548-C is hereby GRANTED and Civil Case No. 548[-C] is hereby ordered DISMISSED for violation of the rule on forum shopping; 2. The Motion to Dismiss Civil Case No. 588-C is likewise hereby GRANTED and the Complaint dated August 13, 1999 is hereby DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. 3. All counterclaims in both cases, Civil Case No. 548-C and 588-C are likewise ordered DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 232176 - SPOUSES ROLANDO/ROLLY AND FE TOBIAS, VS. MICHAEL GONZALES AND MARIO SOLOMON GONZALES, AS REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT, JEMIMA G. ATIGA AND/OR MARIO M. ATIGA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 232176 -
CaseG.R. No. 135394 - JOSE V. DELA RAMA, VS. HON. FRANCISCO G. MENDIOLA, JUDGE, RTC PASAY CITY, THE COURT OF APPEALS AND TITAN CONSTRUCTION CORP..
G.R. No. 135394 -
CaseG.R. No. 131570 - STO. NIÑO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. BRICCIO SANTOS. R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 131570 -