Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 232176 -

G.R. No. 232176 - SPOUSES ROLANDO/ROLLY AND FE TOBIAS, VS. MICHAEL GONZALES AND MARIO SOLOMON GONZALES, AS REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT, JEMIMA G. ATIGA AND/OR MARIO M. ATIGA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered[,] this case is ordered DISMISSED for lack of merit as it would constitute [forum shopping] and violates the rule against [ litis pendentia ]. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered[,] this case is ordered DISMISSED for lack of merit as it would constitute [forum shopping] and violates the rule against [ litis pendentia ]. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 207914 - FCD PAWNSHOP AND MERCHANDISING COMPANY, FORTUNATO C.DIONISIO, JR., AND FRANKLIN C. DIONISIO, VS. UNION BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, ATTY. NORMAN R. GABRIEL, ATTY. ENGRACIO M. ESCASINAS, JR., AND THE REGISTRY OF DEEDS FOR MAKATI CITY.

G.R. No. 207914 -

Case

G.R. No. 171717 - RAMON B. BRITO, SR., VS. SEVERINO D. DIANALA, VIOLETA DIANALA SALES, JOVITA DIANALA DEQUINTO, ROSITA DIANALA, CONCHITA DIANALA AND JOEL DEQUINTO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 171717 -

Case

G.R. No. 161787 - MASING AND SONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CRISPIN CHAN, VS. GREGORIO P. ROGELIO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 161787 -