Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, we find Judge Layague guilty of INEFFICIENCY and fine him in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P5,000.00) with a warning that a similar offense shall be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, we find Judge Layague guilty of INEFFICIENCY and fine him in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P5,000.00) with a warning that a similar offense shall be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. MTJ-00-1303 - VIDALA SACEDA, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE GERARDO E. GESTOPA, JR., ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES, CEBU CITY, BRANCH 4,[1].RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-00-1303
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-98-1405 - MARIA IMELDA MARCOS-MANOTOC AND MARIA IRENE VICTORIA MARCOS-ARANETA, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE EMERITO M. AGCAOILI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-98-1405
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-99-1488 (OCA IPI No. 98-591-RTJ) - JUANA MARZAN-GELACIO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ALIPIO V. FLORES IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE, BRANCH 20, RTC, VIGAN, ILOCOS SUR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-99-1488