Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , in view of all the foregoing, respondent Judge is hereby FINED Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) and STERNLY WARNED that a repetition of the same or similar infractions complained of will be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , in view of all the foregoing, respondent Judge is hereby FINED Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) and STERNLY WARNED that a repetition of the same or similar infractions complained of will be dealt with more severely. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. RTJ-08-2123 (Formerly OCA-I.P.I. No. 07-2679-RTJ) - ALFREDO J. LAGAMON, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE RUSTICO D. PADERANGA, RTC, BRANCH 28, MAMBAJAO, CAMIGUIN.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-08-2123
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-98-1405 - MARIA IMELDA MARCOS-MANOTOC AND MARIA IRENE VICTORIA MARCOS-ARANETA, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE EMERITO M. AGCAOILI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-98-1405
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-07-1670 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 06-1822-MTJ) - ATTY. RODERICK M. SANTOS AND ALEXANDER ANDRES COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE LAURO BERNARDO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BOCAUE, BULACAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-07-1670