G.R. No. 215874 - ARLO ALUMINUM, INC., VS. VICENTE M. PIÑON, JR., IN BEHALF OF VIC EDWARD PIÑON.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premised on the foregoing considerations, judgment is hereby rendered declaring respondent EDUARDO PINION/E.M. PINION/EMP GLAZING, jointly and severally liable to pay complainant, viz: Salary differentials, unpaid service incentive leave pay and 13 th month pay of VIC EDWARD PIÑON's subject to the prescriptive period mandated by Article 291 of the Labor Code. The complaint against ETON PROPERTIES, INC./LUCIO TAN, CE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, JOSE ALILING CONSTRUCTION/DANILO IGNACIO and ARLO ALUMINUM, INC., are hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The Computation Unit is hereby directed to compute the complainant's monetary award subject to the three (3) year prescriptive period which form part of this decision. Other claims are DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.