Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 243951 -

G.R. No. 243951 - RAYMOND D. JACOB, JOERY L. SITJAR, AYAN C. GABRIEL, GREGORIO B. BALATON, LAWRENCE ALBERT N. INSIGNE, AND DENNIS L. TALAMANTE, VS. VILLASERAN MAINTENANCE SERVICE CORP. AND MARIA ANTONIA V. MERCADO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered, declaring respondents guilty of illegal dismissal. Accordingly, respondents are ordered jointly and severally liable: 1. To pay complainants their backwages, computed from the (sic) up to the finality of this decision. As of this date, their backwages, are as follows: NAMES BACKWAGES JOERY SITJAR P59,902.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered, declaring respondents guilty of illegal dismissal. Accordingly, respondents are ordered jointly and severally liable: 1. To pay complainants their backwages, computed from the (sic) up to the finality of this decision. As of this date, their backwages, are as follows: NAMES BACKWAGES JOERY SITJAR P59,902.65 GREGORIO BALATON P59,531.36 LAWRENCE ALBERT INSIGNE P59,531.36 AYAN GABRIEL P68,742.91 RAYMOND JACOB P59,531.36 DENNIS TALAMANTE P59,902.65 2. To pay complainants, the amounts of which opposite their respective names, representing their separation pay: NAMES SEPARATION JOERY SITJAR P163,592.00 GREGORIO BALATON P137,566.00 LAWRENCE ALBERT INSIGNE P125,060.00 AYAN GABRIEL P162,578.00 RAYMOND JACOB P125,060.00 DENNIS TALAMANTE P37,752.00 3. To pay complainants the amounts of which opposite their respective names, representing their pro-rata 13 th month pay for the year 2016: NAMES Pro-rata 13 th MONTH PAY JOERY SITJAR P2,862.86 GREGORIO BALATON P2,845.11 LAWRENCE ALBERT INSIGNE P2,845.11 AYAN GABRIEL P2,845.11 RAYMOND JACOB P2,845.11 DENNIS TALAMANTE P2,862.86 4. To pay complainants an amount equivalent to ten (10%) percent of the total judgment awards, as and for (sic) attorney's fees. Other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. The complaint of RAMIL OLIVEROS is also DISMISSED on the ground of withdrawal of complaint against herein respondents. So, too, with the complaint of RENE MONTUY A, for failure to prosecute his claims. SO ORDERED.