Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 213699 -

G.R. No. 213699 - THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. P/SUPT. ROGER JAMES BRILLANTES, PO3 PETER PAUL PABLICO, AND PO1[1] NOEL FABIA.[G.R. No. 215008] THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. POLICE SENIOR INSPECTOR[2] DANTE G. YANG.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 8294,
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, [this] Office finds respondents P/SUPT. ROGER JAMES BRILLANTES, PO3 NOEL FABIA, PO3 PETER PAUL PABLICO, PO2 REYNALDO YAP and PO1 DANTE YANG GUILTY or Grave Misconduct and hereby metes upon them the penalty of DISMISSAL FROM THE SERVICE with cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification from re­employment in the government service. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, [this] Office finds respondents P/SUPT. ROGER JAMES BRILLANTES, PO3 NOEL FABIA, PO3 PETER PAUL PABLICO, PO2 REYNALDO YAP and PO1 DANTE YANG GUILTY or Grave Misconduct and hereby metes upon them the penalty of DISMISSAL FROM THE SERVICE with cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification from re­employment in the government service. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 250013 - ARNALDO M. ESPINAS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 250013 -

Case

G.R. No. 227405 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. AMADO M. BLOR, JESUS R. BARRERA, ANGELINA O. QUIJANO, POTENCIANO G. VICEDO, MIRAFLOR B. SOLIVEN, AND ANNIE F. CONSTANTINO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 227405 -

Case

A.M. No. P-09-2657 [formerly OCA IPI No. 04-2075-P] - BENJAMIN E. SANGA COMPLAINANT, VS. FLORENCIO SJ. ALCANTARA AND SALES T. BISNAR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. P-09-2657