JurisprudenceG.R. No. 250013 -

G.R. No. 250013 - ARNALDO M. ESPINAS, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 8791,RA 373,RA 6713RA 8791RA 3019RA 6713,RA 146,RA 7653

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, this Office through the undersigned: x x x x (f) FINDS respondents ARNALDO M. ESPINAS, GEORGE S. CHUA, GREGORIO T. IPONG, WILFRED L.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, this Office through the undersigned: x x x x (f) FINDS respondents ARNALDO M. ESPINAS, GEORGE S. CHUA, GREGORIO T. IPONG, WILFRED L. BILLENA, EDITA S. BUENO, and GENEROSO D.C. TULAGAN ADMINISTRATIVELY GUILTY of Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service and metes upon them the penalty of DISMISSAL from the service, including all its accessory penalties of (a) cancellation of eligibility, (b) forfeiture of retirement benefits, (c) perpetual disqualification for re-employment in the government service and (d) perpetual bar from taking Civil Service examinations. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 227405 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. AMADO M. BLOR, JESUS R. BARRERA, ANGELINA O. QUIJANO, POTENCIANO G. VICEDO, MIRAFLOR B. SOLIVEN, AND ANNIE F. CONSTANTINO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 227405 -

Case

G.R. No. 213699 - THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. P/SUPT. ROGER JAMES BRILLANTES, PO3 PETER PAUL PABLICO, AND PO1[1] NOEL FABIA.[G.R. No. 215008] THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. POLICE SENIOR INSPECTOR[2] DANTE G. YANG.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 213699 -

Case

G.R. No. 245855 - ROMEO DC. RESULTA, VS. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE AND CORRUPTION PREVENTION OFFICE (PACPO)-LUZON, REPRESENTED BY MARIVIC B. DELA CRUZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 245855 -