G.R. No. 188666 - SPOUSES JUAN AND ANTONINA CANO, ROLANDO CANO AND JOSEPHINE "JOSIE" CANO­-AQUINO, V. SPOUSES ARTURO AND EMERENCIANA CANO.[G.R. No. 190750, December 14, 2017]SPOUSES JUAN CANO AND ANTONINA SORIANO-CANO, V. SPOUSES ARTURO CANO AND EMERENCIANA DACASIN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-

Ruling

Accordingly, we rule that the CA committed no reversible error in declaring respondents as the rightful owners of the land in the action for the quieting of title; and in ordering petitioners to vacate the property in the ejectment case. As a final point, the Court is aware that our ruling will affect the structures currently standing on the property, which petitioners claim to own. Our decision may then engender certain issues of accession, particularly the right to reimbursement of expenses and payment of damages. Unfortunately, these matters were not raised by any of the parties before this Court or any of the lower courts. The dearth of evidence on this point likewise prevents us from making any pronouncement on the matter. These questions must perforce be dealt with in another proceeding. WHEREFORE , the Petitions are DENIED . The Court of Appeals Decision and Resolution dated 29 April 2009 and 3 July 2009, respectively, in CA-G.R. SP No. 104200, and the Decision and Resolution dated 30 September 2009 and 14 December 2009, respectively, in CA-G.R. CV No. 91587 are hereby AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.