Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants ordering: (1) The defendants and all persons claiming rights under them to immediately vacate the subject premises known as 2351 Pasig Line, Sta. Ana, Manila, and surrender its peaceful possession to the plaintiffs; (2) The defendants to pay reasonable compensation for the use and occupancy of the subject premises in the amount of P500.
Accordingly, on November 10, 1995, respondents filed a Complaint for Unlawful Detainer/Ejectment against petitioners before the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) of Manila. On March 6, 1996, the MeTC of Manila rendered a Decision [3] in favor of respondents, the dispositive portion of which reads: WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants ordering: (1) The defendants and all persons claiming rights under them to immediately vacate the subject premises known as 2351 Pasig Line, Sta. Ana, Manila, and surrender its peaceful possession to the plaintiffs; (2) The defendants to pay reasonable compensation for the use and occupancy of the subject premises in the amount of P500.00 a month beginning October 1985 and every month thereafter until they shall have finally and actually vacated the subject premises; (3) To pay the plaintiffs the sum of P5,000.00 for and as attorneys fees; (4) To pay the costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 134972 - SPS. ERNESTO AND MINA CATUNGAL, VS. DORIS HAO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 134972 -
CaseG.R. No. 147328 - SPOUSES ANTON AND EILEEN LIM, VS. UNI-TAN MARKETING CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 147328 -
CaseG.R. NO. 153860 - VALERIANO B. CANO, VS. SPOUSES VICENTE AND SUSAN JUMAWAN. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 153860 -