Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, [there being] no error in the appealed decision, the same is hereby AFFIRMED in toto ." [3] The decretal portion of the trial court Decision reads as follows: "WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing [evidence] and considerations, this court hereby finds the preponderance of evidence to be in favor of the defendant Gerarda Selma as judgment is rendered: "1. Dismissing this Complaint for Quieting of Title, Cancellation of Certificate of Title of Gerarda vda. de Selma and damages; "2.
WHEREFORE, [there being] no error in the appealed decision, the same is hereby AFFIRMED in toto ." [3] The decretal portion of the trial court Decision reads as follows: "WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing [evidence] and considerations, this court hereby finds the preponderance of evidence to be in favor of the defendant Gerarda Selma as judgment is rendered: "1. Dismissing this Complaint for Quieting of Title, Cancellation of Certificate of Title of Gerarda vda. de Selma and damages; "2. Ordering the plaintiffs to vacate the premises in question and turn over the possession of the same to the defendant Gerarda Selma; "3. Requiring the plaintiffs to pay defendant the sum of P20,000 as moral damages, according to Art. 2217, attorneys fees of P15,000.00, litigation expenses of P5,000.00 pursuant to Art. 2208 No. 11 and to pay the costs of this suit. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 124605 - ENRIQUITO SERNA AND AMPARO RASCA, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, SANTIAGO FONTANILLA, AND RAFAELA RASING. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 124605 -
CaseG.R. No. 188666 - SPOUSES JUAN AND ANTONINA CANO, ROLANDO CANO AND JOSEPHINE "JOSIE" CANO-AQUINO, V. SPOUSES ARTURO AND EMERENCIANA CANO.[G.R. No. 190750, December 14, 2017]SPOUSES JUAN CANO AND ANTONINA SORIANO-CANO, V. SPOUSES ARTURO CANO AND EMERENCIANA DACASIN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-
G.R. No. 188666 -
CaseG.R. No. 146513 - LUCIA G. MIRANDA, VS. ESPERANZA B. BESA.
G.R. No. 146513 -