Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 136021 -

G.R. No. 136021 - BENIGNA SECUYA, MIGUEL SECUYA, MARCELINO SECUYA, CORAZON SECUYA, RUFINA SECUYA, BERNARDINO SECUYA, NATIVIDAD SECUYA, GLICERIA SECUYA AND PURITA SECUYA, VS. GERARDA M. VDA. DE SELMA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 429,RA 69,RA 283,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, [there being] no error in the appealed decision, the same is hereby AFFIRMED in toto ." [3] The decretal portion of the trial court Decision reads as follows: "WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing [evidence] and considerations, this court hereby finds the preponderance of evidence to be in favor of the defendant Gerarda Selma as judgment is rendered: "1. Dismissing this Complaint for Quieting of Title, Cancellation of Certificate of Title of Gerarda vda. de Selma and damages; "2.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, [there being] no error in the appealed decision, the same is hereby AFFIRMED in toto ." [3] The decretal portion of the trial court Decision reads as follows: "WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing [evidence] and considerations, this court hereby finds the preponderance of evidence to be in favor of the defendant Gerarda Selma as judgment is rendered: "1. Dismissing this Complaint for Quieting of Title, Cancellation of Certificate of Title of Gerarda vda. de Selma and damages; "2. Ordering the plaintiffs to vacate the premises in question and turn over the possession of the same to the defendant Gerarda Selma; "3. Requiring the plaintiffs to pay defendant the sum of P20,000 as moral damages, according to Art. 2217, attorneys fees of P15,000.00, litigation expenses of P5,000.00 pursuant to Art. 2208 No. 11 and to pay the costs of this suit. "SO ORDERED.