Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff[,] ordering the defendants [sic] and all persons claiming right[s] under it to vacate the subject premises located at Pulang Lupa I, Las Piñas, Metro Manila and surrender the possession of the same to herein plaintiff; to pay the plaintiff reasonable compensation for the use and occupation of the subject premises hereby fixed at (P100.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff[,] ordering the defendants [sic] and all persons claiming right[s] under it to vacate the subject premises located at Pulang Lupa I, Las Piñas, Metro Manila and surrender the possession of the same to herein plaintiff; to pay the plaintiff reasonable compensation for the use and occupation of the subject premises hereby fixed at (P100.00) one hundred pesos a month starting November 22, 1990 (the time when the demand letter to vacate was given) until defendants actually vacate the property; No pronouncement as to costs and attorneys fees. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 175485 - CASIMIRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. RENATO L. MATEO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 175485 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 115981-82 - RUBEN LAGROSA, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES ROMULO & EVELYN A. BANUA, AND CESAR OROLFO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 115981-82 -
CaseAS REPRESENTED BY NESTOR MONTERO, AND THE OTHER HEIRS OF GASPAR MONTERO, NAMELY, WILSON MONTERO, SYLVIA LEWIS AND DONATO MONTERO, VS. NICANOR PADILLA III
G.R. No. 228417 -