Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, no merit in fact and in law is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED, and the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED by deleting the award of attorney's fees not having been justified but AFFIRMED as to its Order dismissing both the main complaint of [Multi-Realty] and the counterclaim of [MATUSCO]. With costs against both parties. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, no merit in fact and in law is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED, and the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED by deleting the award of attorney's fees not having been justified but AFFIRMED as to its Order dismissing both the main complaint of [Multi-Realty] and the counterclaim of [MATUSCO]. With costs against both parties. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 235604 - SPOUSES LEONARDO AND MARILYN ANGELES, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OLYMPIA C. BERNABE, AURORA ANGELES, PETER A. CARTAGENA, FRANCISCO A. CARTAGENA III, AND MANY PLACES, INC., VS. TRADERS ROYAL BANK (NOW KNOWN AS BANK OF COMMERCE).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 235604 -
CaseG.R. No. 268562 - BURGUNDY REALTY CORP., VS. DANIELA** P. BELLA, GERONIMO BELLA, JR., AND RODRIGO P. BELLA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 268562 -
CaseG.R. NO. 146547 - VILLA MACASASA AND GERTRUDES LANUTAN, VS. JUANITA SICAD AND ERNESTO MACASASA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 146547 -