Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 235604 -

G.R. No. 235604 - SPOUSES LEONARDO AND MARILYN ANGELES, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OLYMPIA C. BERNABE, AURORA ANGELES, PETER A. CARTAGENA, FRANCISCO A. CARTAGENA III, AND MANY PLACES, INC., VS. TRADERS ROYAL BANK (NOW KNOWN AS BANK OF COMMERCE).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing disquisition, for lack of merit, plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED. Defendant bank's counterclaim is likewise dismissed for reasons above discussed. No pronouncement as to costs. Furnish the parties and counsel with a copy of this Decision.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing disquisition, for lack of merit, plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED. Defendant bank's counterclaim is likewise dismissed for reasons above discussed. No pronouncement as to costs. Furnish the parties and counsel with a copy of this Decision. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 232044 - METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST CO., VS. JUNNEL'S MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL..G.R. NO. 232057ASIA UNITED BANK CORPORATION, VS. JUNNEL'S MARKETING CORPORATION, METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST CO., PURIFICACION C. DELIZO, & ZENAIDA CASQUERO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 232044 -

Case

G.R. No. 178467 - SPS. CRISTINO & EDNA CARBONELL, VS. METROPOLITAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 178467 -

Case

G.R. NO. 156033 - FIRST DIVISION EXPRESSCREDIT* FINANCING CORPORATION, VS. SPS. MORTON AND JUANITA VELASCO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 156033 -