Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , we FIND respondent Albert S. Salamat, Sheriff IV of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 80, Malolos, Bulacan, GUILTY of simple misconduct for which we SUSPEND him for one month and one day without pay. We WARN respondent sheriff that a repetition of the same or similar offense shall merit a more severe sanction. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , we FIND respondent Albert S. Salamat, Sheriff IV of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 80, Malolos, Bulacan, GUILTY of simple misconduct for which we SUSPEND him for one month and one day without pay. We WARN respondent sheriff that a repetition of the same or similar offense shall merit a more severe sanction. SO ORDERED.
A.M. NO. P-05-2008 - SPOUSES PRESCILO AND GOMERSINDA TAGALOGUIN, COMPLAINANTS, VS. CONRADO V. HINGCO JR., DEPUTY SHERIFF IV, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT (BRANCH 7), TUBOD, LANAO DEL NORTE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. P-05-2008
CaseA.M. No. P-07-2304 - EMILIA MARIÑAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. TERENCIO G. FLORENDO, SHERIFF V, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT (RTC), BRANCH 21, VIGAN CITY, ILOCOS SUR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-07-2304
CaseA.M. No. P-97-1249 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 95-26-P) - PACITA SY TORRES, COMPLAINANT, VS. FROILAN S. CABLING, DEPUTY SHERIFF, RTC, MALABON, METRO MANILA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-97-1249