Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is GRANTED . The Court of Appeals Decision dated February 27, 2009 and Resolution dated June 23, 2009 are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The November 12, 2007 Order of petitioner, the Office of the Ombudsman, for the preventive suspension of respondent is REINSTATED . SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the petition is GRANTED . The Court of Appeals Decision dated February 27, 2009 and Resolution dated June 23, 2009 are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The November 12, 2007 Order of petitioner, the Office of the Ombudsman, for the preventive suspension of respondent is REINSTATED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164250 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND DENNIS M. VILLA-IGNACIO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. ATTY. GIL A. VALERA AND COURT OF APPEALS (SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION). D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164250 -
CaseG.R. NO. 167828 - THE OMBUDSMAN, FACT-FINDING AND INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION BUREAU, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. NESTOR S. VALEROSO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 167828 -
CaseG.R. No. 192723 - LEOVIGILDO A. DE CASTRO, V. FIELD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS.
G.R. No. 192723 -