Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, the extant Petition is GRANTED . The Order of the Ombudsman, placing the petitioner (now respondent) under preventive suspension for six (6) months without pay, having been issued with grave abuse of discretion is hereby ANNULLED and SET ASIDE. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
accordingly annulled and set aside the said order [5] of preventive suspension, to wit: WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing, the extant Petition is GRANTED . The Order of the Ombudsman, placing the petitioner (now respondent) under preventive suspension for six (6) months without pay, having been issued with grave abuse of discretion is hereby ANNULLED and SET ASIDE. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164250 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND DENNIS M. VILLA-IGNACIO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. ATTY. GIL A. VALERA AND COURT OF APPEALS (SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION). D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164250 -
CaseG.R. No. 139043 - MAYOR ALVIN B. GARCIA, VS. HON. ARTURO C. MOJICA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR THE VISAYAS, VIRGINIA PALANCA-SANTIAGO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN (VISAYAS), ALAN FRANCISCO S. GARCIANO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS GRAFT INVESTIGATION OFFICER I, OFFICE OF
G.R. No. 139043 -
CaseOFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. PRISCILLA S. CORDOVA, DEPUTY COLLECTOR FOR ASSESSMENT, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS.
G.R. No. 188650 -