Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered- 1. Finding no illegal dismissal of complainant; 2. Ordering respondent to pay complainant: a. Salary differentials: May 11, 1998 to Dec.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered- 1. Finding no illegal dismissal of complainant; 2. Ordering respondent to pay complainant: a. Salary differentials: May 11, 1998 to Dec. 31, 1999 (P153 - P130 = P23.00 x 511 days) = P11, 753.00 Jan. 2, 2000 - Oct. 31, 2000 (P163 - P160 = P3.00 x 259 days) = 777.00 Nov. 1, 2000 - Dec. 31, 2000 (P173 - P160 = P13.00 x 51 days) = 663.00 Jan. 2, 2001 - Apr. 30, 2001 = NIL May 1, 2001 - May 11, 2001 (P177.00 - P173 = P4.00 x 10 days) = 40.00 P13, 233.00 b. Service Incentive Leave Pay 1998 - P153 x 5 days = 765.00 1999 - P153 x 5 days = 765.00 2000 - P173 x 5 days = 865.00 P 2,395.00 GRAND TOTAL P15,628.00 3. All other claims are denied for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 175345 - BALTAZAR L. PAYNO, VS. ORIZON TRADING CORP./ORATA TRADING AND FLORDELIZA LEGASPI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 175345 -
CaseG.R. No. 211522 - J' MARKETING CORPORATION, ROGELIO U. SOYAO, EVP-GENERAL MANAGER, PEPITO P. ESTRELLAN, KALIBO BRANCH MANAGER, VS. FERNANDO S. IGUIZ.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 211522 -
CaseG.R. No. 172601 - AILEEN G. HERIDA VS. F & C PAWNSHOP AND JEWELRY STORE/MARCELINO FLORETE, JR.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 172601 -