JurisprudenceA.M. No. RTJ-02-1736

A.M. No. RTJ-02-1736 - SPOUSES ARTURO AND JOSEFINA DE GUZMAN, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE FERNANDO VIL PAMINTUAN, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 3, BAGUIO CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 302,RA 46,RA 287RA 10,RA 280RA 382,RA 405

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant administrative complaint against respondent Judge Fernando Vil Pamintuan is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant administrative complaint against respondent Judge Fernando Vil Pamintuan is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-00-1589 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 99-736-RTJ) - JEANET N. MANIO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE JOSE ENER S. FERNANDO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 5, DINALUPIHAN, BATAAN.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-00-1589

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-02-1717 (Formerly AM OCA IPI No. 00-1107-RTJ) - FERMA PORTIC, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE VICTORIA VILLALON-PORNILLOS, AS PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 10, MALOLOS, BULACAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-02-1717

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1860 - SPOUSES FLORENCIO & ESTHER CAUSIN, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE LEONARDO N. DEMECILLO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 24, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY. RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1860