TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the Complaint at bar against respondent Judge Jose Ener S. Fernando is hereby DISMISSED . SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, the Complaint at bar against respondent Judge Jose Ener S. Fernando is hereby DISMISSED . SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. RTJ-02-1736 - SPOUSES ARTURO AND JOSEFINA DE GUZMAN, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE FERNANDO VIL PAMINTUAN, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 3, BAGUIO CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-02-1736
CaseA.M. No. MTJ-04-1523 (formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 99-780-MTJ) - DARIO MANALASTAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE RODRIGO R. FLORES, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 2, SAN FERNANDO, PAMPANGA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. MTJ-04-1523
CaseA.M. No. RTJ-03-1759 (OCA I.P.I No. 00-925-RTJ) - JIMMY T. GO AND ATTY. GREGORIO D. CAÑEDA JR., COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE ZEUS C. ABROGAR, PRESIDING JUDGE, RTC-BR. 150, MAKATI CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. RTJ-03-1759