JurisprudenceG.R. NO. 156427 -

G.R. NO. 156427 - AMANDO TETANGCO, VS. THE HON. OMBUDSMAN AND MAYOR JOSE L. ATIENZA, JR.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 437,RA 636,RA 173,RA 3019RA 143,

View Original Source Compare

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant petition is DISMISSED for lack of merit. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , the instant petition is DISMISSED for lack of merit. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 194157 - ROMEO R. ARAULLO, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, HON. MERCEDITAS N. GUTIERREZ, HON. GERARDO C. NOGRALES, HON. ROMEO L. GO, HON. PERLITA B. VELASCO, HON. ARDEN S. ANNI, ATTY. FILOMEMO B. BALBIN, ATTY. ERNESTO P. TABAO AND ATTY. ROBERTO F. DE LEON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Libr

G.R. No. 194157 -

Case

G.R. No. 116938 - LEONILA GARCIA-RUEDA, VS. REMEDIOS A. AMOR,* RAUL R. ARNAU, ABELARDO L. APORTADERA, JR., FRANCISCO A. VILLA,** ALL OF THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, AND LEONCIA R. DIMAGIBA, ASSISTANT CITY PROSECUTOR, MANILA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 116938 -

Case

G.R. NO. 166038 - WILFREDO M. TRINIDAD, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN THRU THE OMBUDSMAN SIMEON V. MARCELO AND DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN VICTOR C. FERNANDEZ, ASIA’S EMERGING DRAGON CORPORATION, AND THE SANDIGANBAYAN PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 166038 -