Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the Court hereby DISMISSES the petition for lack of merit. No costs. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE , the Court hereby DISMISSES the petition for lack of merit. No costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 194157 - ROMEO R. ARAULLO, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, HON. MERCEDITAS N. GUTIERREZ, HON. GERARDO C. NOGRALES, HON. ROMEO L. GO, HON. PERLITA B. VELASCO, HON. ARDEN S. ANNI, ATTY. FILOMEMO B. BALBIN, ATTY. ERNESTO P. TABAO AND ATTY. ROBERTO F. DE LEON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Libr
G.R. No. 194157 -
CaseG.R. NO. 156427 - AMANDO TETANGCO, VS. THE HON. OMBUDSMAN AND MAYOR JOSE L. ATIENZA, JR.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 156427 -
CaseG.R. NO. 166038 - WILFREDO M. TRINIDAD, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN THRU THE OMBUDSMAN SIMEON V. MARCELO AND DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN VICTOR C. FERNANDEZ, ASIA’S EMERGING DRAGON CORPORATION, AND THE SANDIGANBAYAN PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 166038 -