Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds [accused-appellant] guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violation of Sec. 11, Art. II of R.A.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds [accused-appellant] guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violation of Sec. 11, Art. II of R.A. 9165 in Crim. Case No. 15510 and imposes upon her the penalty of imprisonment for twelve (12) years and one (1) day as minimum to fourteen (14) years as maximum, and to pay a FINE of Three Hundred Thousand Pesos (P300,000.00). Said [accused-appellant] is also found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violation of Sec. 5, Art. II of R.A. 9165 in Crim. Case No. 15511 and imposes upon her the penalty of LIFE IMPRISONMENT and to pay a FINE of Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (P500,000.00). The prohibited dangerous drugs, subject of these cases, are ordered CONFISCATED in favor of the government. The OIC-Branch Clerk of Court is directed to prepare the Mittimus for the immediate transfer of the herein [accused-appellant] to the Correctional Institute (sic) for Women and to immediately turn over the specimens subject of these cases to the Director, PDEA, Region III, Camp Olivas, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, for proper disposition. Furnish all concerned parties with copies of this Joint Decision. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 222648 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. EDITHA TAMPAN, ACCUSED-.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 222648 -
CaseG.R. No. 228255 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, V. MARY JANE CADIENTE Y QUINDO @ JANE, ACCUSED-.
G.R. No. 228255 -
CaseG.R. No. 223713 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. RODELINA MALAZO Y DORIA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 223713 -