JurisprudenceG.R. NO. 167680 -

G.R. NO. 167680 - SAMUEL PARILLA, CHINITA PARILLA AND DEODATO PARILLA, VS. DR. PROSPERO PILAR. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 498,RA 761,RA 35,RA 344,RA 625,RA 771,RA 141,RA 414RA 1159,RA 1172,

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED . The Court of Appeals Decision of January 19, 2005 is AFFIRMED in light of the foregoing discussions. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED . The Court of Appeals Decision of January 19, 2005 is AFFIRMED in light of the foregoing discussions. Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 166758 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, REPRESENTED BY MANOLO C. FERNANDO, VS. VICENTE ATILANO, NAZAAR LUIS, JOCELYN DELA DINGCO, SHARON SEE VICENTE, AND JOHN DOES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 166758 -

Case

G.R. NO. 162895 - MA. ELIZABETH KING AND MARY ANN KING, VS. MEGAWORLD PROPERTIES AND HOLDINGS, INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. NO. 162895 -

Case

G.R. No. 167278 -