JurisprudenceG.R. NO. 162895 -

G.R. NO. 162895 - MA. ELIZABETH KING AND MARY ANN KING, VS. MEGAWORLD PROPERTIES AND HOLDINGS, INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 555,RA 365,RA 523,

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED for lack of merit. The Decision dated January 27, 2004 and Resolution dated March 24, 2004 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED for lack of merit. The Decision dated January 27, 2004 and Resolution dated March 24, 2004 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 80560 are hereby AFFIRMED . Costs against petitioners. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. NO. 162927 -

Case

G.R. No. 166758 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, REPRESENTED BY MANOLO C. FERNANDO, VS. VICENTE ATILANO, NAZAAR LUIS, JOCELYN DELA DINGCO, SHARON SEE VICENTE, AND JOHN DOES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 166758 -

Case

G.R. No. 166819 - SPOUSES OSCAR ARCENAS[1] AND DOLORES ARCENAS, VS. QUEEN CITY DEVELOPMENT BANK AND COURT OF APPEALS (NINETEENTH DIVISION).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 166819 -