Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED for reason of prematurity and/or lack of cause of action against the herein defendants Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Philippine National Bank (PNB). This Judgment is, however, without prejudice to its (Complaint) refiling by the plaintiffs once the Sugar Restitution Fund under R.A. No.
WHEREFORE, the Complaint is hereby DISMISSED for reason of prematurity and/or lack of cause of action against the herein defendants Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Philippine National Bank (PNB). This Judgment is, however, without prejudice to its (Complaint) refiling by the plaintiffs once the Sugar Restitution Fund under R.A. No. 7202 or any fund for that purpose is already set up and ready for distribution. The counterclaims interposed by defendants Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Philippine National Bank (PNB) are dismissed for lack of proof and basis. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 235604 - SPOUSES LEONARDO AND MARILYN ANGELES, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OLYMPIA C. BERNABE, AURORA ANGELES, PETER A. CARTAGENA, FRANCISCO A. CARTAGENA III, AND MANY PLACES, INC., VS. TRADERS ROYAL BANK (NOW KNOWN AS BANK OF COMMERCE).DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 235604 -
CaseG.R. No. 207377 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, VS. SPOUSES NESTOR AND FELICIDAD VICTOR AND SPOUSES REYNALDO AND GAVINA VICTOR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 207377 -
CaseG.R. No. 205966 - BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS, VS. FELICIANO P. LEGASPI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 205966 -