TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, in CA-G.R. CV No. 51521, the decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, in CA-G.R. CV No. 51521, the decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION. Judgment is rendered as follows: Declaring the Real Estate Mortgage to be valid; Fixing the interest at 12% per annum and an additional 1% penalty charge per month such that plaintiffs-appellants' contractual obligation under the deed of real estate mortgage would amount to P1,252,674.00; Directing defendant-appellee Dio to give the surplus of P2,247,326.00 to plaintiffs-appellants; and Affirming the dissolution of the writ of preliminary injunction previously issued by the trial court. No pronouncement as to costs. The Petition in CA-G.R. SP No. 40457 is DENIED for being moot and academic. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 168940 - SPS. ISAGANI CASTRO AND DIOSDADA CASTRO, VS. ANGELINA DE LEON TAN, SPS. CONCEPCION T. CLEMENTE AND ALEXANDER C. CLEMENTE, SPS. ELIZABETH T. CARPIO AND ALVIN CARPIO, SPS. MARIE ROSE T. SOLIMAN AND ARVIN SOLIMAN AND JULIUS AMIEL TAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 168940 -
CaseG.R. No. 121703 - NATIVIDAD T. TANGALIN, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, DR. RAMON L. COCSON, JOSEFINA G. COCSON, EDITHA G. TIGLAO, FE F. GOMEZ, AND ATTY. PEDRO F. MARTINEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 121703 -
CaseG.R. NO. 169647 - ANTONIO CHIENG, SUBSTITUTED BY WILLIAM CHIENG, VS. SPOUSES EULOGIO AND TERESITA SANTOS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 169647 -