Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 169191 -

G.R. No. 169191 - ROMEO VILLARUEL, VS. YEO HAN GUAN, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE YUHANS ENTERPRISES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 590RA 541,RA 565
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainant and against herein respondent, as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to pay separation benefits equivalent to one-half (½) month salary per year of service, a fraction of six months equivalent to one year to herein complainant based on the complainant's length of service reckoned from June 1963 up to October 1998 as provided under Article 284 of the Labor Code, the same computed by the Computation and Exami…

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainant and against herein respondent, as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to pay separation benefits equivalent to one-half (½) month salary per year of service, a fraction of six months equivalent to one year to herein complainant based on the complainant's length of service reckoned from June 1963 up to October 1998 as provided under Article 284 of the Labor Code, the same computed by the Computation and Examination Unit which we hereby adopt and approved (sic) as our own in the amount of NINETY-ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE PESOS (P91,445.00); 2. Ordering the respondents to pay service incentive leave equivalent to fifteen days' salary in the amount of THREE THOUSAND FIFTEEN PESOS (P3,015.00). All other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.