Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainant and against herein respondent, as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to pay separation benefits equivalent to one-half (½) month salary per year of service, a fraction of six months equivalent to one year to herein complainant based on the complainant's length of service reckoned from June 1963 up to October 1998 as provided under Article 284 of the Labor Code, the same computed by the Computation and Exami…
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the complainant and against herein respondent, as follows: 1. Ordering the respondents to pay separation benefits equivalent to one-half (½) month salary per year of service, a fraction of six months equivalent to one year to herein complainant based on the complainant's length of service reckoned from June 1963 up to October 1998 as provided under Article 284 of the Labor Code, the same computed by the Computation and Examination Unit which we hereby adopt and approved (sic) as our own in the amount of NINETY-ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE PESOS (P91,445.00); 2. Ordering the respondents to pay service incentive leave equivalent to fifteen days' salary in the amount of THREE THOUSAND FIFTEEN PESOS (P3,015.00). All other claims are dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 158458 - ASIAN TERMINALS, INC. AND ATTY. RODOLFO G. CORVITE, JR., VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS AND COMMISSION, DOMINADOR SALUDARES, AND ROMEO L. LABRAGUE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 158458 -
CaseG.R. No. 192318 - REYNO C. DIMSON, VS. GERRY T. CHUA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 192318 -
CaseG.R. No. 158539 - INDUSTRIAL & TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT, INC. AND/OR RAYMOND JARINA, VS. TOMAS TUGADE AND CRESENCIO TUGADE.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 158539 -