Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
Wherefore, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Directing respondent Sta. Lucia Realty and Development Corporation, Inc. to cause to be vacated complainant's lot denominated as Lot No.
Wherefore, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Directing respondent Sta. Lucia Realty and Development Corporation, Inc. to cause to be vacated complainant's lot denominated as Lot No. 3, Block No. 4, Phase II, Greenwood Executive Village, Cainta, Rizal; 2. In the alternative, the aforesaid respondent is ordered to reimburse the complainant the current market value of the subdivision lot which shall in no case be less than P4,500.00 per square meter, the prevailing price in the area; 3. Directing the same respondent to pay complainant the following amount: a. P100,000.00 as and by way of moral damages; b. P50,000.00 as and by way of exemplary damages; c. P50,000.00 as and by way of attorney's fees; 4. While the third party complaint is dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. P-07-2356 - VIRGINIA L. APRIETO, COMPLAINANT, VS. NOEL C. LINDO, SHERIFF IV, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 83, QUEZON CITY. DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-07-2356
CaseG.R. Nos. 115981-82 - RUBEN LAGROSA, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES ROMULO & EVELYN A. BANUA, AND CESAR OROLFO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 115981-82 -
CaseG.R. No. 194818 - CHARLES BUMAGAT, JULIAN BACUDIO, ROSARIO PADRE, SPOUSES ROGELIO AND ZOSIMA PADRE, AND FELIPE DOMINCIL, VS. REGALADO ARRIBAY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 194818 -