Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, these consolidated petitions are hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated March 25, 2008 and the Resolution dated August 28, 2008 of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No.
accordingly amend or modify its n1les as the interest of justice may require. With that, the CA cannot just stay the execution of decisions rendered by the OMB when its rules categorically and specifically warrant their enforcement, else the OMB's rule-making authority be unduly encroached and the constitutional and statutory provisions providing the same be disregarded. [20] WHEREFORE, premises considered, these consolidated petitions are hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated March 25, 2008 and the Resolution dated August 28, 2008 of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No. 02886 are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 177580 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. VICTORIO N. MEDRANO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 177580 -
CaseG.R. No. 166658 - EUSTAQUIO B. CESA, VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND COMMISSION ON AUDIT-REGION VII.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 166658 -
CaseG.R. No. 159395 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND DR. MERCEDITA J. MACABULOS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 159395 -