Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 184464 -

G.R. No. 184464 - CINDY SHIELA COBARDE-GAMALLO, VS. JOSE ROMEO C. ESCANDOR.[GR. NO. 184469] OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. JOSE ROMEO C. ESCANDOR.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 7877RA 738RA 797RA 574RA 140RA 542RA 428
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered, these consolidated petitions are hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated March 25, 2008 and the Resolution dated August 28, 2008 of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No.

Decision

Ruling

accordingly amend or modify its n1les as the interest of justice may require. With that, the CA cannot just stay the execution of decisions rendered by the OMB when its rules categorically and specifically warrant their enforcement, else the OMB's rule-making authority be unduly encroached and the constitutional and statutory provisions providing the same be disregarded. [20] WHEREFORE, premises considered, these consolidated petitions are hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated March 25, 2008 and the Resolution dated August 28, 2008 of the CA in CA-G.R. SP No. 02886 are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE . SO ORDERED.