Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the petition is GIVEN DUE COURSE. The assailed memorandum dated June 13, 2001 and the order dated July 26, 2001 of the Office of the Ombudsman in OMB Case No. 0-98-0438 are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The earlier decision of the GOI I Ulysis S.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the petition is GIVEN DUE COURSE. The assailed memorandum dated June 13, 2001 and the order dated July 26, 2001 of the Office of the Ombudsman in OMB Case No. 0-98-0438 are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The earlier decision of the GOI I Ulysis S. Calumpad of the Office of the Ombudsman is REINSTATED and the subject complaint DISMISSED. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 177580 - OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. VICTORIO N. MEDRANO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 177580 -
CaseG.R. NO. 156652 - DR. BENITA F. OSORIO, VS. HON. ANIANO A. DESIERTO, AS OMBUDSMAN, HON. PRIMO C. MIRO, AS DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR THE VISAYAS, HON. VIRGINIA PALANCA-SANTIAGO, OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR FOR THE VISAYAS, AND HON. SAMUEL MALAZARTE, OMBUDSMAN INVESTIGATING PROSECUTOR FOR THE VISAYAS.D E C I S I O
G.R. NO. 156652 -
CaseG.R. No. 171481 - CORAZON C. BALBASTRO, VS. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VI. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 171481 -