Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing considerations, the subject motion for reconsideration filed by the prosecution is granted. Accordingly, the order of this court dated August 25, 2004, granting the accused's motion to quash the information is hereby reconsidered and set aside and, therefore, the accused's motion to quash the information is denied. SO ORDERED.
Accordingly, the MCTC set aside its earlier order and denied petitioner's motion to quash, the decretal portion of which reads as follows: WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing considerations, the subject motion for reconsideration filed by the prosecution is granted. Accordingly, the order of this court dated August 25, 2004, granting the accused's motion to quash the information is hereby reconsidered and set aside and, therefore, the accused's motion to quash the information is denied. SO ORDERED.
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2012 [OCA-IPI NO. 04-2106-RTJ] - IGNACIO E. MAYLAS, JR., COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE MANUEL L. SESE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF MASBATE CITY, BRANCH 45.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2012
CaseG.R. No. 161075 - RAFAEL JOSE CONSING, JR., VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 161075 -
CaseG.R. NO. 158763 - JOSE C. MIRANDA, ALBERTO P. DALMACIO, AND ROMEO B. OCON, VS. VIRGILIO M. TULIAO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 158763 -