Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The Orders dated November 26, 2001 and March 18, 2002 issued by the respondent Judge are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Respondent Judge is hereby ordered to proceed with the hearing of Criminal Case No. 00-120 with dispatch.
WHEREFORE, the petitioners motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The Orders dated November 26, 2001 and March 18, 2002 issued by the respondent Judge are hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Respondent Judge is hereby ordered to proceed with the hearing of Criminal Case No. 00-120 with dispatch. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 148193 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. RAFAEL JOSE CONSING, JR..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 148193 -
CaseA.M. NO. RTJ-06-2012 [OCA-IPI NO. 04-2106-RTJ] - IGNACIO E. MAYLAS, JR., COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE MANUEL L. SESE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF MASBATE CITY, BRANCH 45.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. NO. RTJ-06-2012
CaseG.R. No. 167409 - RODOLFO B. GARCIA, RETIRED MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT JUDGE, CALATRAVA-TOBOSO, NEGROS OCCIDENTAL, VS. PRIMO C. MIRO, OMBUDSMAN-VISAYAS, CEBU CITY; DANIEL VILLAFLOR, PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR, BACOLOD CITY; HON. FRANKLIN M. COBBOL, ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE, MCTC, CALATRAVA-TOBOSO, NEGR
G.R. No. 167409 -