Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the Plaintiffs and against Defendants-Intervenor: 1. Declaring the Plaintiffs the absolute and rightful owners of the premises in question; 2. Ordering the Defendants-Intervenor to: a. vacate from the premises in question; b.
WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the Plaintiffs and against Defendants-Intervenor: 1. Declaring the Plaintiffs the absolute and rightful owners of the premises in question; 2. Ordering the Defendants-Intervenor to: a. vacate from the premises in question; b. remove the beauty shop thereat; c. jointly and severally, pay the Plaintiffs, a monthly rental of P1,500.00 of the premises starting from March 1987, and the amounts of P75,000.00 for moral damages, P5,000.00 for litigation expenses, and P10,000.00 for Attorneys fees; and d. to pay the costs. The injunction issued in this case is hereby made permanent. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 144189 - R & M GENERAL MERCHANDISE, INC., VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND LA PERLA INDUSTRIES, INC.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 144189 -
CaseG.R. No. 118744 - IRENEO V. GUERRERO, VS. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, JOSEFA VDA. DE ALMEDA, ANGELITA A. CRUZ, ERLINDA A. CHIKIAMCO, FREDESVINDA A. CONSUNJI, ZENAIDA A. ROXAS, EMMANUEL M. ALMEDA, ERMELO M. ALMEDA, DOMINADOR M. ALMEDA AND BENJAMIN M. ALMEDA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Libr
G.R. No. 118744 -
CaseG.R. NO. 158867 - JIMMY BANTING, ALFRED REYES AND MAXIMA ARCENO REYES, VS. SPS. JOSE MAGLAPUZ AND RAYMUNDA BANDIN MAGLAPUZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 158867 -