TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, decision is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant: (1) Quieting the plaintiff’s title to the two parcels of land described in the complaint and/or removing the cloud cast thereon by the defendant, by declaring the plaintiff the lawful owner thereof and entitled to their possession; (2) Ordering the defendant to vacate said property and to restore the possession thereof to the plaintiff; (3) Ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff the valu…
WHEREFORE, premises considered, decision is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant: (1) Quieting the plaintiffs title to the two parcels of land described in the complaint and/or removing the cloud cast thereon by the defendant, by declaring the plaintiff the lawful owner thereof and entitled to their possession; (2) Ordering the defendant to vacate said property and to restore the possession thereof to the plaintiff; (3) Ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff the value of the fruits of said property at the rate of P50,000.00 a year or P450,000.00 for nine years covering the periods 1973 to 1982, inclusive, with interest until paid; P25,000.00 expenses for labor and construction materials; P10,000.00 as moral damages; and P2,000.00 as attorneys fees and other expenses incident thereto; (4) Ordering defendant to pay the costs of suit. The counterclaim of defendant is hereby dismissed. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 134090 - ERNESTO R. CRUZ, LUCIA NICIO AND GUILLERMO COQUILLA, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND SPOUSES JOSE AND MIGUELA LOMOTAN. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 134090 -
CaseG.R. No. 117228 - RODOLFO MORALES, REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS, AND PRISCILA MORALES, VS. COURT OF APPEALS (FORMER SEVENTEENTH DIVISION), RANULFO ORTIZ, JR., AND ERLINDA ORTIZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 117228 -
CaseG.R. No. 222297 - FORTUNATO ANZURES, VS. SPOUSES ERLINDA VENTANILLA AND ARTURO VENTANILLA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 222297 -