TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, judgment is hereby rendered by DISMISSING the instant petition, as it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. All claims and other counterclaims the parties may have against each other [are] likewise dismissed for want of evidence. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing, judgment is hereby rendered by DISMISSING the instant petition, as it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. All claims and other counterclaims the parties may have against each other [are] likewise dismissed for want of evidence. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 164695 - HEIRS OF JOSE BARREDO, NAMELY, LOLITA BARREDO, ANNALIZA BARREDO AND MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, REPRESENTED BY MARICHU BARREDO-EPE, VS. LAVOISER BESAÑES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 164695 -
Case(BOTH DECEASED), NAMELY: OLIVER B. SUYAM, MABLE B. SUYAM, CHRISTOPHER B. SUYAM, ABEL B. SUYAM, AND CHESTER B. SUYAM, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-INFACT AND ON HIS OWN BEHALF, TELESFORO B. SUYAM, V. HEIRS OF FELICIANO JULATON @ PONCIANO, NAMELY: LUCINA J. BADUA, SEMEON JULATON, JULIANA J. BUCASAS,
G.R. No. 209081 -
CaseG.R. No. 200539 - HEIRS OF KUKUNGAN TIMBAO, REPRESENTED BY MUSA TIMBAO, HALIMA TIMBAO ANDANG, FATIMA TIMBAO ISMAEL, OMAR TIMBAO, AND ZUBAINA TIMBAO ATOG, VS. OSCAR D. ENOJADO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 200539 -